Management of ossifying fibroma of the bone of the maxilla: a case report and review of the literature.

Ossifying fibroma (OF) is a slow-growing benign fibro-osseous neoplasm. It is mostly odontogenic in origin, and it arises in the jaws, particularly the mandible. OF is characterized by the production of bone and cementum-like calcifications in a fibrous stroma. OF reports of the bone of the maxilla are uncommon. Diagnosing OF can be challenging due to the considerable overlap of clinico-pathological characteristics with those of other neoplasms. Herein, the authors describe a case report OF in a 26-year-old male who presented with a huge fibro-osseous tumor of the maxilla. Histopathology established the diagnosis of maxillary OF. The tumor was surgically removed via a Weber-erguson approach with satisfactory functional and cosmetic results. No recurrence has been found after one year of follow-up. Clinical, radiological, and pathological characteristics, as well as surgical treatment approaches, are further discussed. This is one of a few documented cases of maxillary OF in our setting.

Operative Treatment of a Patient with a Pathological Fracture through a Large Non-ossifying Fibroma: A Case Report.

Introduction: Non-ossifying fibroma (NOF) is a common benign fibrogenic bone lesion commonly found in the metaphysis of long bones. While small NOFs are typically asymptomatic and left untreated, large NOFs are often associated with pathologic fractures that can be treated conservatively or operatively. To our knowledge, the NOF presented in this case report is one of the largest reported in the literature. Case Report: We present a case of a 12-year-old Hispanic female who presented to our institution after falling off a horse and landing on her right leg and wrist. Radiographs revealed a right distal femur fracture through an unusually large lytic bone lesion. The patient was treated with curettage, grafting, open reduction, and internal fixation, given the unstable and pathological nature of the fracture. Conclusion: This case substantiates the literature that large fractures through a NOF can be appropriately managed operatively. However, orthopedic surgeons should be aware of the risks of surgery, including infection, when considering operative management of patients who present with large unstable pathologic fractures through a NOF.

Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma of Maxillary Gingiva with Calcification: A Case Report.

Peripheral ossifying fibroma is presented as an exophytic growth with a smooth surface. It is located mostly on the gingiva, and it is an unusual growth of gingiva that occurs after irritational trauma. It is seen in the later decade of life, with the calcifications in the lesion in advanced stages seen on radiographic images. In the present case, a 50-year-old male reported with a huge gingival growth in the left maxillary posterior gingival region; when radiograph was taken, it showed calcifications. The patient was treated by surgical excision of the growth.

Psammomatoid ossifying fibroma in the frontal sinus: An intriguing clinical encounter-A detailed case report.

BACKGROUND: Psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (POF) is a rare craniofacial neoplasm, primarily affecting the maxillofacial region, and typically observed in adolescents and young adults. This case report presents a unique occurrence of POF in a 50-year-old male, defying the conventional age range and exhibiting an unusual anatomical location within the frontal sinus. CASE: A 50-year-old male with a prior history of cecal adenocarcinoma and colectomy presented with left eye proptosis and new-onset headaches. Imaging revealed a well-defined calcified mass in the left frontal sinus, leading to a diagnosis of POF. Open surgical resection was performed to remove the tumor, and histopathological evaluation confirmed its diagnosis as psammomatoid ossifying fibroma. The patient exhibited no postoperative complications or signs of recurrence. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the diverse clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges associated with POF, emphasizing the importance of accurate diagnosis and multidisciplinary collaboration. Further research is needed to explore the genetic underpinnings and optimal management strategies for this intriguing condition.

Ossifying fibroma of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses: A report of a rare case and literature review.

Background: Fibro-osseous lesions include a variety of bone lesions with different clinical and histopathological features. Case Description: We report a case of cemento-ossifying lesion involving the left ethmoid and sphenoid sinus in a 17-year-old male patient. Computed tomography showed an expansile hyperdense lesion with sclerosed peripheral mantle epicentered on the left ethmoid and sphenoid sinus and extending into the left nasal cavity. Magnetic resonance imaging was done for preoperative planning. Transnasal endoscopic resection was performed and histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of ossifying fibroma (OF). Conclusion: Involvement of the ethmoid sinus with OF is a rare condition; therefore, we examined the literature for similar cases to highlight the possible clinical presentation and management. Endoscopic management is a safe, effective approach with a low rate of complications.

Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma of the Mandible: A Case Report.

Benign osseous tumors of mesodermal origin that are included within the group of fibro-osseous lesions include cemento-ossifying fibromas (COFs). The fibrocellular component of these diseases originates from the periodontal ligament, which deposits bone and cementum encased in fibrous tissue. It typically appears in the mandible and presents as a solitary, nonaggressive, slowly developing, asymptomatic, expansile lesion, rarely occurring in the maxilla. The only intervention that proved to be successful in producing excellent outcomes and that may be regarded as a final therapeutic option is the complete surgical removal of COFs. Presenting herein is a case report describing a painless and expansile mass in the left mandibular region, histopathologically diagnosed as COF.

Role of collagen and immunostaining for TGF-β in the clinical andmicroscopic findings of pyogenic granuloma and peripheral ossifying fibroma

Background: Collagen is a component of Pyogenic Granuloma (PG) and Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma (POF) and performs different functions in these lesions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of collagen and immunostaining for Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF-β) in the clinical and microscopic findings of PG and POF. Material and Methods: PG (n=20) and POF (n=20) were selected for clinical evaluation (sex, age, localization, size and evolution time) and microscopic analysis (picrosirius red staining for collagen analysis and immunohistochemistry for TGF-β) performed in the superficial and deep areas of the two lesions. ANOVA/Bonferroni and t-test, Pearson correlation and χ2 were used to compare the sites and parameters analyzed (p<0.05, GraphPad Prism 5.0). Results: The depth of PG presented the highest amount of collagen (p<0.001), and its surface showed the lowest amount of type 1 collagen (yellow-red strong birefringence). Type 1 collagen gradually increased in depth of PG, surface and depth of POF (p<0.001). The number of TGF-β+ cells was lower on the surface of PG compared with the depth of PG and the two areas of POF (p<0.001). Sex and localization did not affect these parameters, but the profile of collagen and immunostaining for TGF-β suffered from modifications by the time of evolution and the size of the lesion. Conclusions: Although PG and POF are reactive gingival lesions, the expression of TGF-β and its role in collagen showed different biological behaviors in these lesions, suggesting different biological origins for its components. (AU)

Literature Review, Case Presentation and Management of Non-ossifying Fibroma of Right Angle of Mandible: More Than just a Cortical Defect!

Non-ossifying fibroma (NOF) of jaw bones are rare. While NOF is the most common benign bone tumor of long bones with pathognomonic radiological features and bear a tendency for self-regression, gnathic NOF appears to be comparatively larger in size and behave more aggressively. A 16 years old female patient reported with painless swelling of the right side of the face of 4 months duration. Radiographic analysis showed a unilocular radiolucent lesion of right angle of the mandible with ill-defined margins, cortical perforation and thinning of inferior border. The lesion was provisionally diagnosed as odontogenic keratocyst/unicystic ameloblastoma and incisional biopsy was performed. The histopathological features and immunohistochemical characteristics favored a diagnosis of NOF. The lesion was excised and reconstructed. The excised specimen confirmed the diagnosis. There are no signs of recurrence at 18 months follow-up. NOF should be considered in the differential diagnosis of uni-/multilocular radiolucencies of jaws particularly the posterior mandible.

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for unusual sellar lesions: eight cases and review of the literature.

Background: Preoperative imaging for some unusual lesions in the sellar region can pose challenges in establishing a definitive diagnosis, impacting treatment strategies. Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of eight cases involving unusual sellar region lesions, all treated with endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS). We present the clinical, endocrine, and radiological characteristics, along with the outcomes of these cases. Results: Among the eight cases, the lesions were identified as follows: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) in one case, Lymphocytic hypophysitis (LYH) in one case, Cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSH) in one case, Ossifying fibroma (OF) in two cases; Sphenoid sinus mucocele (SSM) in one case, Pituitary abscess (PA) in two cases. All patients underwent successful EETS, and their diagnoses were confirmed through pathological examination. Postoperatively, all patients had uneventful recoveries without occurrences of diabetes insipidus or visual impairment. Conclusion: Our study retrospectively analyzed eight unusual lesions of the sellar region. Some lesions exhibit specific imaging characteristics and clinical details that can aid in preoperative diagnosis and inform treatment strategies for these unusual sellar diseases.

Expansive Central Ossifying Fibroma of the Right Mandible.

This case report discusses a 28-year-old patient who presented with a large expansile lesion of the right mandible. A maxillofacial CT showed a 6.7 x 9.1 x 7.6 cm right mandibular cystic mass containing an internal matrix of ground glass bone, representing a huge odontogenic keratocyte. Upon biopsy of the lesion, the specimen consisted of non-decalcified irregular fragments of cemento-osseous material, embedded in a minimally hemorrhagic, cellular fibrous tissue stroma, suggestive of central ossifying fibroma. This case presents an ossifying fibroma that far exceeds the average size of these masses, which typically range from 1.0 to 2.5 cm at its greatest dimension. The immense size of the lesion seen in this case is rarely encountered. This case also helps to emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis and complete resection of the lesion to prevent mass recurrence and possible malignant transformation.

Imaging of Fibro-osseous Lesions and Other Bone Conditions of the Jaws.

This review directs the focus on the imaging features of various fibro-osseous lesions and other bone lesions that can be of similar presentation. Broad diagnosis of "fibrous osseous lesion" may culminate in improper treatment and management. Radiographic discriminating factors between these entities are highlighted and summarized to improve the diagnostic process when encountering these lesions.

Ossifying fibroma of the maxilla: A case report with literature review.

Ossifying fibroma is a benign fibro-osseous lesion arising from the periodontal ligament cells. The lesion may progressively enlarge with the mass affecting the mandible or maxilla, resulting in facial deformities and tooth displacement despite its benign nature. Here, we presented a case of an 18-year-old female with ossifying fibroma in the maxilla extending to the maxillary sinus, infraorbital area, and skull base, resulting in considerable facial asymmetry. Since the primary treatment of ossifying fibroma is surgical resection, it is essential to determine the areas where the lesion has expanded, where a 3-dimensional computed tomography scan could play a critical role in providing such information. A complete surgical excision and histopathologic examination in treating this patient are crucial, made possible by a meticulous preoperative radio imaging technique.

Ossifying fibroma from surgical excision to periodontal management: case report.

Introduction and importance: Peripheral ossifying fibroma is one of the commonly occurring reactive benign lesions that occurs in the gingiva, predominantly in females, especially in the anterior maxillary region of young women and in pediatric patients. It causes unsatisfactory esthetics, difficulty in maintaining good oral hygiene and difficulty in mastication.The importance of this clinical case is to emphasize the interest of early management of the residual defect after the removal of the gum growth. Case presentation: A 39-year-old female patient was referred to the clinical department of periodontology, with the chief complaint of bleeding gingiva, unsatisfactory esthetics and gum growth on the interproximal area in relation to left maxillary canine and premolar region, with the size ~2 cm×1.5 cm. Clinical discussion: This article describes an atypical case of peripheral ossifying fibroma with the clinical, histopathologic, and radiographic features in the posterior maxilla in an adult female patient. Treatment consisted of complete surgical excision, gingival curettage, and management of keratinezed gingiva by utilizing laterally displaced flap. Clinical healing was satisfactory at 2 weeks, and excellent coverage of residual mucogingival defect with no evidence of recurrence was achieved 3 weeks postoperatively. The patient was satisfied with case resolution with a follow-up of 1 year. Conclusion: Although surgical excision is the treatment of choice, sometimes it may induce residual soft tissue defect, which may further precipitate functional and esthetic discrepancies if not managed.

Giant fronto-spheno-orbitary juvenile psammomatoid ossifying fibroma: Case report and literature review.

Juvenile psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (JPOF) is an osteofibrous neoplasm that originates in the craniofacial skeleton typically during the first three decades of life. JPOFs usually involve the orbit, paranasal sinuses or the jaws. Extensive involvement of the anterior cranial base with compromised visual function is a rare phenomenon. In such clinical context, a definite diagnosis can only be made on the basis of histopathological findings, given the absence of pathognomonic radiological features. Despite being considered a benign entity, JPOFs present a locally aggressive behavior. Therefore, these neoplasms must be included in the differential diagnosis in every patient harboring a skull base osteofibrous lesion, and, once diagnosed, gross total surgical removal should be attempted. In this study, we present our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of a patient diagnosed with a giant JPOF involving the cranial base.

Comprehensive Genomic Analysis of Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma.

Cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF) of the jaws is currently classified as a benign mesenchymal odontogenic tumor, and only targeted approaches have been used to assess its genetic alterations. A minimal proportion of COFs harbor CDC73 somatic mutations, and copy number alterations (CNAs) involving chromosomes 7 and 12 have recently been reported in a small proportion of cases. However, the genetic background of COFs remains obscure. We used a combination of whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing to assess somatic mutations, fusion transcripts, and CNAs in a cohort of 12 freshly collected COFs. No recurrent fusions have been identified among the 5 cases successfully analyzed by RNA sequencing, with in-frame fusions being detected in 2 cases (MARS1::GOLT1B and PARG::BMS1 in one case and NCLN::FZR1 and NFIC::SAMD1 in the other case) and no candidate fusions identified for the remaining 3 cases. No recurrent pathogenic mutations were detected in the 11 cases that had undergone whole-exome sequencing. A KRAS p.L19F missense variant was detected in one case, and 2 CDC73 deletions were detected in another case. The other variants were of uncertain significance and included variants in PC, ACTB, DOK6, HACE1, and COL1A2 and previously unreported variants in PTPN14, ATP5F1C, APOBEC1, HDAC5, ATF7IP, PARP2, and ACTR3B. The affected genes do not clearly converge on any signaling pathway. CNAs were detected in 5/11 cases (45%), with copy gains involving chromosome 12 occurring in 3/11 cases (27%). In conclusion, no recurrent fusions or pathogenic variants have been detected in the present COF cohort, with copy gains involving chromosome 12 occurring in 27% of cases.

High-grade osteosarcoma arising in DCIA flap reconstruction after a prior resection of maxillar cemento-ossifying fibroma: A case report.

Cemento-ossifying fibroma is a rare benign odontogenic tumour of the tooth-bearing jaws. Its concomitant occurrence with osteosarcoma, a malignant maxillofacial bone tumour, has never been described before. We present an uncommon case of a 43-year-old woman in whom a cemento-ossifying fibroma in the right maxilla was treated by resection and reconstruction using a deep circumflex iliac artery flap. During surgical prosthetic rehabilitation one-year post-operative, an osteosarcoma extending from the contralateral maxilla was coincidentally discovered in the deep circumflex iliac artery flap. The aim of this case report is to raise awareness on the extremely rare but possible simultaneous and independent occurrence of a cemento-ossifying fibroma and an osteosarcoma.

A giant peripheral ossifying fibroma of the mandible: A rare case report.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral ossifying fibroma (POF) is an unusual localized, reactive benign gingival growth. POF is usually small in size, it's measure <2 cm in diameter, but rarely reaches important sizes. The aim of this work was to present a rare case report of a giant peripheral ossifying fibroma of the mandible measuring >2 cm in diameter, misdiagnosed as peripheral myxoma. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with a large peripheral ossifying fibroma in the oral cavity measuring 6 × 4 cm in diameter. The patient presented with an asymptomatic, slowly growing gingival mass in the left anterior and posterior region of the mandible. It gradually increased in size for more than two years. The patient had a mild mental deficit; however, we performed biopsy surgery, which revealed a peripheral myxoma, and then treated the tumor by excision under local anesthesia. The final histopathological examination revealed a peripheral ossifying fibroma. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case report shows that POF can grow and reach unusual dimensions that may contribute to occlusal problems. The diagnosis of POF is based on clinical and radiographic features. The histopathological examination of the biopsy specimen can misdiagnose the lesion; therefore, the final diagnosis is based on the histopathological examination of the complete excised lesion. CONCLUSION: POF is usually small, but can reach a larger size. The histopathological examination of the entire lesion is of paramount importance to make a final diagnosis.

Management of Peripheral Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma Associated With Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Case Report.

The peripheral cemento-ossifying fibroma (PCOF) lesion primarily affects females in their second decade of living. These lesions are more frequently associated with the gingival margin, the anterior surface of the molars, and the maxilla. On clinical examination, PCOF typically appears as a well-differentiated, slowly expanding gingival mass in the interdental papilla region that is less than 2 cm in size. The surface may seem ulcerated, the base may be sessile or sometimes pedunculated, and the colour is either the same as the gingiva or reddish. The histological examination, which identifies cellular connective tissue and the focal presence of bone or calcifications, provides the basis for the final diagnosis. Treatment modalities for the PCOF include surgical excision of the lesion. A 38-year-old female reported slow-growing swelling associated with the maxillary anterior region. Removal of the lesion is done by using a scalpel, and histopathological examination revealed the peripheral type of cemento-ossifying fibroma. This case report demonstrates the management of PCOF lesions with the conventional scalpel approach with the help of proper clinical examination, radiological findings, and histopathological examination, which reveals favourable outcomes in the patient regarding esthetics and improves mastication-related issues and speech.

Clínica, epidemiología e imagenología del fibroma osificante y la displasia fibrosa del territorio cráneo-maxilofacial: revisión narrativa / Clinical, epidemiology and imaging of ossifiying fibroma and fibrous dysplasia of the cranio-maxillofacial territory: narrative review

Introducción: El fibroma osificante (FO) y la displasia fibrosa (DF) tienen características imagenológicas e histopatológicas similares que dificultan el diagnóstico diferencial. El propósito de la presente revisión narrativa es analizar las características clínicas, epidemiológicas e imagenológicas del FO y la DF, y evaluar la relación entre las características imagenológicas y las variantes histopatológicas del FO, en reportes y series de casos publicados.Materiales y métodos:Se realizó una búsqueda de reportes y series de casos de FO y DF entre 2017-2021 en PubMed, Scopus y Web of Science. Los casos debían tener suficiente información clínica, epidemiológica, histopatológica e imagenológica.Resultados:Se incluyeron 23 artículos con 25 lesiones: 17 FO y 8 DF. El tiempo de evolución de DF es más prolongado que FO. FO se ubica con mayor tendencia en complejo osteomeatal en comparación con DF. Sólo FO presentó alteraciones en piel, radiolucidez/hipodensidad periférica, perforación ósea y rizalisis externa, además, tuvo mayor tendencia al avance a espacios anatómicos adyacentes y a generar asimetría facial y/o craneal. FO psammomatoide y FO trabecular comparten patrones imagenológicos y tienen límites definidos corticalizados. FO convencional tuvo mayor tendencia a perforar corticales. DF puede tener límites mal definidos y definidos corticalizados. El FO mostró características imagenológicas de mayor agresividad que la DF.Conclusiones:La histología e imagenología por sí solas no son decisivas en el diagnóstico de FO y DF. Es imprescindible considerar conjuntamente clínica, imagenología e histopatología, enfatizando en las características que orienten el diagnóstico diferencial.(AU)

Introduction: Ossifying fibroma (OF) and fibrous dysplasia (FD) have similar imaging and histopathological characteristics, which make differential diagnosis difficult. The aim of this narrative review was to analyze the clinical, epidemiological and imaging characteristics of OF and FD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between imaging characteristics and histopathologic variants of OF, in reports and case series published.Materials and methods:A search of reports and case series of OF and FD between 2017-2021 in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed. The cases had to have enough clinical, epidemiological, histopathological and imaging information.Results:23 articles with 25 lesions were included: 17 OF and 8 FD. FD had a longer time of evolution than OF. OF is more likely to be in osteomeatal complex compared to FD. Only OF had skin alterations, peripheral radiolucency/hypodensity, bone perforation and external root resorption, in addition, it had a greater tendency to advance to adjacent anatomical spaces and generate facial and/or cranial asymmetry. Psammomatoid OF and trabecular OF share imaging patterns and have defined and corticated margins. Conventional OF had a greater tendency to cortical perforation. DF can have ill-defined and defined and corticated margins. OF has imaging characteristics of greater aggressiveness than FD.Conclusion:Histology and imaging alone are not decisive in OF and FD diagnosis. It is essential to consider clinical, imaging and histopathological evaluations as a whole, emphasizing in the characteristics that guide the differential diagnosis.(AU)